This is an information resource for the English - an indigenous (native) people of the British Isles. The purpose is to give assistance in their struggle against betrayal, State treason, and genocide.

A Betrayal of Past Sacrifices

The British people are to be denationalised [2]. The political ambition of an arrogant, governing elite is to indulge in their ideological fantasies through enforced social engineering.

A key part of this process is to destroy the ancient ethnic nations of The British Isles. The historical journey of our particular communities (the British ethnie) - a journey of some 15,000 years - is to be brought to an end by an ultimate act of Treachery and Betrayal, by a hostile self-serving State. The State is, by stealth, making war against us, the people of these Islands - and, most especially, against the English.

A Treason, Without Precedent

For the first time in our history, the State, whose first duty is to defend the Nation and our Sovereignty, is actively engaged in destroying it. This is the fundamental nature of the State’s evil machinations. Those that feel passionately for their country know that it is this directed malevolence that needs to be stopped.

Even with the use of new draconian regulations, the treasonous State has problems controlling the premature hatemongering and violent excesses of its own collaborationist groups and auxiliaries. This illustrates the gravity of our situation. We have a duty to see that this Great Treason is undone.

An Unlawful Surrender Of Our Sovereignty

On Thursday 18th October 2007 Britain's then (un-elected) Primeminister, Mr. Gordon Brown, signed the Lisbon Treaty. It was an act of Treason.

It is treason to act (or conspire) contrary to the Act of Supremacy 1559, Praemunire 1392, the 1351 Treason Act, the 1848 Treason Felony Act - and Treason at Common Law [1].

Since 1972, Parliament has treasonably surrendered the supremacy of the peoples’ (our) sovereignty to an alien foreign power - it has unlawfully, and conspiratorially, allowed the Constitution and the Crown to be subjugated to the power of the European Union. Our Sovereign representative (The Queen), as official Governor of the nation, has failed to fulfil her Oath and duty to protect the people against the treachery of Parliament. It has been observed: "Parliament, having in reality discarded the Crown, the Monarch and the Constitution, is part of the European Union (EU). The British People are not a part of the EU, for they never agreed to join it, or give up their inalienable right to be an independent people of self political determination. Parliament ... is not only an unlawful assembly but a political dictatorship, for it no longer represents the political aspirations of the people" [3].

The legal obligations, placed on the Monarch by the Oath, are set out in Halsbury’s Laws. One of the principal duties imposed on the Crown, by the swearing of this Oath, is:  “to govern the peoples of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, and the dominions etc belonging or pertaining to them according to their respective laws and customs”; where: “the laws of England are the birthright of the people thereof …” [4].

Those that seek to live by other forms of law other than English Common Law, or conspire to promote the adoption of other forms of law (such as the European system of Corpus Juris), are committing treason. Those that work for agencies of the Crown must swear an Oath of allegiance to the Crown. If they aid or support these acts, then they are committing common law Treason. Those that know of these acts, and do nothing, are by default committing 'misprision of Treason' [5].

The Denationalisation Agenda

The political rationale for the destruction of our ancient nations was set out in the early part of the 20th Century by Marxist idealogues such as Antonio Gramsci: attack the historic pillars of society within a nation by constant defamation and criticism - the public institutions, armed forces, politicians, the police, education, and particularly the teaching of national history and national identity; break down the boundaries between the private and public sectors so that the defined lines of responsibility of accountability disappear; and (then) install a new (Marxist) controlling system, piece by piece, until the single party state has been achieved.

It is this subversive agenda that our political masters are following, to 'deconstruct' (a euphemism for destroying) both our nation and our sense of nationhood.

Our Parliament is now an instrument of State control – working against the interests of the people. Our identity as a sovereign nation is being destroyed by a treasonous political aristocracy that has institutionalised lying, betrayal, deceit, dissimulation and obsfucation - that: " … Britain has a lying government, which systematically and as a matter of routine falsifies the facts … Government lying amounts to a horrifying assault on civil society, the main reason that mendacity is always embedded in totalitarian regimes.” [6]. Changes of Government do not alter this situation.

Efforts to 'deconstruct' (destroy) the English Church are especially prominent. We recall the warning of Sir Karl Popper (generally regarded as one of the greatest philosophers of the 20th Century) who was of the firm belief that it was the spiritual breakdown occasioned by Marxism that led to the growth of Fascism in Europe in the 1930s. [7]. And now, in the begining of the 21st Century, an uncompromising and alien religious 'final solution' is eagerly anticipating our own naive self-destruction.

Rule by State Thuggery

English philosoper and writer Roger Scruton provides a particularly insightful and succint description of the traditional subservient position of the State in Law: "The English law existed not to control the individual but to free him. It was on the side of the subject against those – whether usurping politicians or common criminals – who wished to bend him unconsenting to their will" [8]. The journalist Peter Hitchins also observes this vital arrangement: "In the English common law tradition, quite distinct from those of our Continental neighbours, it is the State that is answerable to us. We are presumed innocent in the widest possible sense. We can walk down any street without being challenged to prove who we are or explain what we are doing. We are, in short, sovereigns over ourselves, left alone to live our private lives as we wish provided we obey a law we have made ourselves. Or rather, this is what we were until our elite State began its great reforms fifty years ago" [9].

In the last few decades State politicians have completely reversed the traditional relationship between the people, the law, and the law enforcers. Again, Peter Hitchins sums up the old relationship as: "the British principle [is] that it is the right and duty of each citizen to preserve the peace and bring malefactors to justice, with its corollary that the police are merely paid to act on the citizens behalf" [10].

We now have black-uniformed, paramilitary police, who clearly see themselves as servants of the State.

Diversifism is Moral Cowardice

Diversifism is a political invention, founded upon the concept of the essential subjectivity of ideas (especially cultural beliefs and values). Those advancing diversifism believe there should be no ranked or privileged values or beliefs - and (of course) they believe this position should be beyond argument and unchallengeable. Diversifism provides a refuge for those too cowardly to make a moral choice - or to act ethically.

The politics of diversity is justified on the supposed moral (and practical) superiority of a society with a multiplicity of cultural values and beliefs. It is used a political weapon in the 'deconstruction' (destruction) of monoculture nations, such as the English nation. Not surprisingly the law enforcement establishment, and the police in particular, are being required to embrace diversifism as part of this process of 'deconstruction'.

"Peace Through Diversity"

[Metropolitan Police Service and Greater London Authority, 2nd Annual Peace Talks, 2006]

Diversifism is used to kill any critical examination of the process of colonization, population displacement, and population replacement within these Islands. It has been used as a tool to destroy social inclusivity and cultural homogeneity.

We are seeing a resurrection of 1930s-style totalitarian sloganeering. We have, for example: ‘Strength in Diversity’ [Commission for Racial Equality, resource document], and, of course, the universally applied deceit ‘The Enrichment of Diversity’. In even the smallest of local police stations you will see signs offering translation services in 27 different languages, and posters exhorting us to 'face the challenge of diversity'. What you probably won't see is much effort in catching villains, or keeping us safe on the streets and in our homes. The police understand their new priorities. The chatter with the upper echelons of the police service is of 'community cohesion' - something we already had 50 years ago before the political classes got busy with their 'deconstruction' project.

Police Anti-English Racialism

The political subversion of the law enforcement agencies is most apparent in the various training programmes to make the police 'racially aware' - the 'diversity awareness' training programmes, and the liason committee meetings with the many political pressure groups supporting 'minorities' rights'. These are all contrary to the principles of common law - that the police must deal with law enforcement matters only on the facts of each individual case, on the alleged criminal act itself – that a defendant’s (or victim’s) particular skin colour, their gender, their political or religious allegiance, their social class or their cultural background are (in law) all irrelevant.

In 2005 Avon and Somerset Police unlawfully discriminated against "white" (English) candidates in its recruitment programme. The force rejected 186 white applicants because, it said, its workforce was "over-represented by white men". Under the Race Relations Act, shortlisting or appointing on racial grounds is unlawful. The Chief Constable was subsequently forced to publish an apology for "inappropriate" (wrong and insulting) behaviour by the force, and one of the rejected applicants subsequently won an undisclosed sum in compensation in an out-of-court settlement [11][12].

The embracing of diversifism provides opportunities for sedition and treason. For example, in a written parliamentary answer in November 2006 the then Labour Home Secretary, John Reid, declared that those working for the Home Office Immigration and Homeland Security Department would not have to declare their membership of the fanatical Hizb-ut-Tahrir organisation. This followed the revelation that the Home Office IT Manager, Abid Javaid, was a member of the extremist organisation. It is well known that Hizb-ut-Tahrir supports a worldwide Islamic state run under Sharia law and has openly refused to condemn the 2005 London bombings [13][14].

Thought Control

In the latter part of the 16th Century Queen Elizabeth I, involved in the bitter struggles between Protestants and Catholics, and the very real danger of insurrection, showed immense political skill (and great moral courage) by declaring to have: "no desire to make windows into men's souls". Unfortunately our present political elite have precisely that sinister ambition - they wish to control people's thoughts, and persecute and punish those who may harbour 'politically incorrect' ideas.

It is therefore hardly surprising, therefore, that we see the political State keen to subject members of the police service to examination for 'incorrect' thinking. Plans are well advanced, and have already been trialed in Scotland, to use psychometric tests to "weed out bigots and racists within the force" [15][16]. Presumably this isn't a reference to the Chief Constable of Avon and Somerset Constabulary.

There is now legislation to enforce State control, and punish dissenters. The enforcement of this new regime is being implemented with the same political tactics as used by totalitarian states 70 years ago to identify the "enemies of the people" - the identification of an 'evil' adversary (the indigenous English, asserting their right to self-determination). We now have: changes to the law to criminalise dissent; changes to the law to enhance political power; political corruption and electoral fraud; the suppression of criticism and open debate; the politicisation of the police and judiciary; and the use of the schools for politically indoctrinating our children.

The use of 'sectioning' powers are deployed via FTAC (Fixated Threat Assessment Centres) as a way of incarcerating, as 'mentally ill', those who express dissent, or challenge the State.

Securing State Control

One of the most disturbing features of the Great Treason is the role of the security services and law enforcement agencies in suppressing dissent and protest - and of giving effective assistance to the treasoners. A case study examination of the complicity of agencies in assisting an unlawful Parliament - in breach of their oaths of office - can be downloaded here.

War by Other Means

The criminal political elite are actively engaged in aiding a 'war by other means' - a war directed against the indigenous, sovereign people of these islands. The political elite are the instigators and principle enablers in this 'war' - in enabling the occupation of our territory; the destruction of our social, cultural and constitutional institutions; and in genocide. It is a seditious, stealthy form of warfare with an end objective of destroying the nations and the native peoples of the British Isles.

References

[1] see: R v Thistlewood 1820 - to seek to destroy the Constitution is an act of Treason

[2] 'Denationalise' - deprive (a nation) of its status or characteristics as a nation. [The Concise Oxford Dictionary, OUP, 1990]

[3] Bob Lomas, The Magna Carta Society, PO Box 358, Horsham, West Sussex, RH13 7FY.

[4] 'The Coronation Oath', Standard Note 5N/PC/435, 30th November 2005, Aileen Walker and Oonagh Gay, Parliament and Constitution Centre document

[5 ] 'Where Corrupt Law Lords Fail - Ordinary People Take Treason Charges to The Police', David Barnby and Albert Burgess, The UK Column, September 2007

[6] 'The Rise of Political Lying', Peter Osborne, The Free Press, 2005, page 117

[7] in 'Open Society and Its Enemies', Karl Popper

[8 ] 'England- an Elegy', Roger Scruton .

[ 9] 'The Abolition of Liberty - The Decline of Order and Justice in England', Peter Hitchins, Atlantic Books, 2004, page 29

[ 10] ibid., page 117

[11] 'Police Force Pays Off Over Non-White Recruitment Bias', and 'Avon and Somerset Police Chief Admits To Recruitment Blunder', Reed Business Information, March 2006

[12] 'Police To Put Racists To The Test', BBC News (website), 14th May 2005, and 'Police Service Considers Psychometric Tests To Weed Out Racists', Reed International, 28th September 2006

[13] 'Home Office Staff Can Join Islamic Extremists', This is London, 30th November 2006

[14] 'Hate Videos of Muslim Group They Failed to Ban', Duncan Gardham, The Daily Telegraph, 15th November 2006

[15] 'Police To Put Racists To The Test", BBC News 24, 14th May 2004.

[16] 'Police Service Considers Psychometric Tests To weed Out Racists', Reed Business Information, 28th September 2006